Kevin Rudd, no Robin Hood....but rather just an angry Elemental.
I often watch news events as a way to understand how karmic opportunities for evolution play out on the global political and financial stage. I also habitually clairvoyantly look at the personal archetypal structures inherent to particular political and financial leaders to better understand how they affect their behaviour. More often than not I will clairvoyantly see a leader’s archetypes superimposed over them whilst they are being interviewed or if a photograph is featured in a newspaper.
So as I watched the latest developments play out since the decision by the Rudd government to introduce a super profits tax on everything that comes out of the ground. I have had a new opportunity to look below the surface and understand how a lack of archetypal integrity in our leaders can at times severely rock the boat and potentially cause a great deal of harm to certain sectors of our community and our environment.
As I watched Kevin Rudd interviewed a number of times I noticed a discomfort in my gut. There was a large level of incongruence, between what he was saying and the place (motivation) from where he delivered his message. What he was saying about the minerals belonging to all the Australian people and how this tax would help his government redistribute the wealth back to these same people was a typical “Robin Hood statement”. However as I watched his personal energetic archetypes (superimposed over his face) I was intrigued, for no Robin Hood energy was anywhere in sight here. Instead an angry “Elemental Gnome” archetype was very active in his energy field, as was a disrupted masculine Set archetype. My intuition was revealing a different reason at play, very different to the most obvious one being sold to the electorate.
A true and balanced Robin Hood archetype in an individual usually promotes a true redistribution of wealth and resources which is also ecologically sound. So in this example it would have been more likely to produce a tax or rather an incentive to the mining companies, to reinvest some of their profits into more sophisticated and environmentally sound mining techniques. Over recent years many of these companies have taken the initiative and searched for more environmentally- responsible mining techniques themselves. This super tax on the other hand is more likely to create cost cutting measures and possibly a “cutting corners” attitude to any costly environmentally friendly measures being researched and implemented.
As far as, redistributing the wealth from the Rich mining giants to the Australian people...how so? I wondered why the likes of Rio Tinto, BHP and Fortescue would not move whatever operations they could offshore and hence redistribute their mining and financial expertise, which has contributed to the economic wellbeing of Australia for so long actually away from the Australian people. I wondered too how much richer the Australian public would be if building, transport and cost of manufactured goods rose as a flow on result of this tax? Even cement products might cost more in time, since limestone mining would be subjected to this tax.
Anyway I am not a financier but a simple working mum so I shrugged my shoulders and focused back on Rudd’ interview and noticed that the angry Elemental Gnome energy within him was determined to stop these miners from taking minerals out of the ground faster than the Elementals of Nature could reproduce replacements. So I pondered on why the funds from this super tax if we had to have it, could not perhaps be in part re-directed into investigating more efficient ways to utilise resources. This I thought might eventually produce more resource-efficient-manufacturing techniques instead of the redirected funds being given away as “vote-buying” increases to people’s super etc. Maybe given a little more respect, the mining and manufacturing companies would have funded some of the research into such areas themselves, had the government given them a tax incentives to do so instead of trying to destroy their commercial spirit (Hermes archetype).
I obviously did not know enough here, surely if it was that easy someone would have thought of it already. So I looked back at Rudd being interviewed with faith, but lost heart a little when I noticed a disrupted masculine “Set” archetype energy heavily etched on his features which simply wanted to take away what others had. He had run out of funds. A disrupted SET means he had been unable to curtail his own spending. Set is the masculine archetype which equips an individual to set personal limits, such as in budgets. Well no one is perfect I thought but I wonder if I sent him a bottle of Set whether he would take the elixir? Being a politician is such a big job I thought. It is so easy to sit back and judge someone in such a vulnerable and exposed position.
My thoughts then turned to the Australian electorate. I wondered as I clairvoyantly looked at the future. Would they, take up the karmic challenge of looking past the illusion, which makes them feel separate to these giant mining companies and the people who run them. Would they, remember that corporations are made up of people not dissimilar to themselves who at times take huge commercial risks to make precious resources available to us all. Would Australians recognise that, the men who run these companies are inherently often pre-disposed to do what has to be done in the most efficient way possible till we know, “how to do it better” Looking at an image of Andrew Forest, executive director of Fortesque Metals I noticed dominant “Elemental Dryad and Dwarf” energy in his inherent archetypal pattern. This energy would make it hard for him to plunder the earth but more likely support him in finding the most practical and efficient ways to access her resources.
These corporations are not charities and they openly acknowledge that. However doing the job they do for profit is not a reason to single them out as a single cash cow. Would Australians look past the pre-election shenanigans of both parties and demand social, economic and environmentally sound policies from their politicians? Would we one day have a system where we simply voted on policies not parties and then governments simply implemented these same policies? I hoped so.
Though the results of the next election are not determined yet, when I take a clairvoyant peep at the future I do suspect the super resources tax will probably need to be tempered so the Rudd government becomes less likely be voted out. At this point in time however I see two possible futures still available in the fields of potentiality.
Though I cannot and do not use my clairvoyance to spy on these leader’s personal information, my ability to see this sort of energetic and karmic interplay across the globe is informative and has helped me understand the importance of focusing on better co-operation between all peoples and view-points both in my meditations and personal actions.